Friday, April 29, 2011

Cathedrals Final draft

Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals played a huge part on life in the early years of European life. However, even though they were both cathedrals they meant two different things and where made for different purposes. The Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals where two like buildings that were completely different. Romanesque and Gothic cathedrals represented two different views on theological belief, Romanesque believed that God would hold up and defend them, Gothics believed that God would bring light to their lives; these theological differences are expressed` in architecture. Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals did not mean anything about theology.
            The Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals exterior structures where very different. Romanesque cathedrals where all about defense with no low lying windows and thick walls no big windows either (figure 1). In the gothic cathedrals we see a much different structure with low lying windows and big windows along with very thin walls (figure 1-1). The Romanesque cathedrals where built this way because of the belief that god will bring them protection against their enemies or sin.  The Gothic Cathedrals focused in on how God brings light to the world. There was no need for the extra layers of wall thin walls made the church blend with its elegant windows. Also, both types of cathedrals where very large because they were central points of the civilization.
            The interior structures of the cathedrals also where very different. On the Romanesque cathedral side we had large heavy pillars on the inside and dark filled corridors (Figure 2). On the gothic side of this idea we have beautiful elegant stained glass windows along with thin divine artistic looking pillars (figure 2-1). This meant that the Romanesque Cathedrals focused more on how god will support us and hold up the heavy burdens of our lives.  The Gothic cathedrals focused in on how god brings beauty to the world. Also, The Gothic cathedrals really dial in on expressing their compassion for all God has done for them by being more expressive in their architecture.
            Also the two Cathedrals where looked at and used for different purposes. In the Romanesque Cathedrals we have a garrison looking structure used for protection where their city could retreat in times of need (figure 3). In the Gothic Cathedrals they are looked at more of a celebratory building. Used to really honor the mighty God they served(structure 3-1).  The Romanesque Cathedrals where heavily fortified making them for great sources for protection. The Gothic Cathedrals were very bright and very colorful setting the atmosphere to praise God in. Also, The Romanesque Cathedrals where hard to breech so it was ideal to take cover there.
            Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals; two completely different structures that look incredibly similar. One used to celebrate God. The other was used to protect the city from siege. Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals represent different spiritual beliefs.  Both however, Are magnificent structures built through history.


Appendix
Figure 1

Figure 1-1

figure 2
figure 2-1


Figure 3
Figure 3-1



Bibliography
Figure 1 Abazia di San Vittore (Genga), façade, 11th century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abaziasanvittorefrasassi.jpg photo taken in 2006
Figure 2 Mainz Cathedral, interier, 12th century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Castle-rising-castle.JPG photo taken in 2006
Figure 3 The Tower of London, façade, 11th century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_London  Photo taken in 2004
Figure 1-1 Ripon Cathedral, façade, 7th century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ripon_Cathedral_2.jpg photo taken in 2006
Figure 2-1 Chapter House at York Minster, interior, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:YorkMinsterChapterHouse.jpg photo taken in 2003
Figure 3-1 Bad Doberan Münster, interior, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bad_Doberan_M%C3%BCnster_(11)_2006-09-24.JPG phot taken in 2006


Thursday, April 28, 2011

Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals Rough

Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals played a huge part on life in the early years of European life. However, even though they were both cathedrals they meant two different things and where made for different purposes. To sum it up, the Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals where too like buildings that were completely different. Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals express different understandings about religious theology. Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals did not mean anything about theology.
            The Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals exterior structures where very different. Romanesque cathedrals where all about defense with no low lying windows and thick walls no big windows either (figure 1). In the gothic cathedrals we see a much different structure with low lying windows and big windows along with very thin walls (figure 1-1). The Romanesque cathedrals where built this way because of the belief that god will bring them protection against their enemies or sin.  The Gothic Cathedrals focused in on how God brings light to the world. There was no need for the extra layers of wall thin walls made the church blend with its elegant windows. Also, both types of cathedrals where very large because they were central points of the civilization.
            The interior structures of the cathedrals also where very different. On the Romanesque cathedral side we had large heavy pillars on the inside and dark filled corridors (Figure 2). On the gothic side of this idea we have beautiful elegant stained glass windows along with thin divine artistic looking pillars (figure 2-1). This meant that the Romanesque Cathedrals focused more on how god will support us and hold up the heavy burdens of our lives.  The Gothic cathedrals focused in on how god brings beauty to the world. Also, The Gothic cathedrals really dial in on expressing their compassion for all God has done for them by being more expressive in their architecture.
            Also the two Cathedrals where looked at and used for different purposes. In the Romanesque Cathedrals we have a garrison looking structure used for protection where their city could retreat in times of need (figure 3). In the Gothic Cathedrals they are looked at more of a celebratory building. Used to really honor the mighty God they served(structure 3-1).  The Romanesque Cathedrals where heavily fortified making them for great sources for protection. The Gothic Cathedrals were very bright and very colorful setting the atmosphere to praise God in. Also, The Romanesque Cathedrals where hard to breech so it was ideal to take cover there.
            Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals; two completely different structures that look incredibly similar. One used to celebrate God. The other was used to protect the city from siege. Romanesque and Gothic Cathedrals represent different spiritual beliefs.  Both however, Are magnificent structures built through history.




Friday, April 15, 2011

Fall of Rome Final

“As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear, without surprise or scandal, that the introduction, or at least the abuse, of Christianity had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.” (Gibbon) The Empire split due to religion. Instead of being in camps worshiping the emperor, people where in synods worshiping their gods. This caused the emperors to get annoyed and Tyranny began. While religion played a large role in the fall of the Roman Empire, it still also lessened the violence. Due to Constantine’s conversion to Christianity, the conquerors of the Roman Empire where mollified. 
“The decay of Rome has been frequently ascribed to the translation of the seat of empire; but this history has already shown that the powers of government were divided rather than removed.”(Gibbon) Rome was not really one empire. It was more so two smaller empires put together, the east and west. The Byzantine Empire, the east, was ruled by one emperor. However, the West side was ruled by a series of emperors.  This set up made the Byzantine Empire slightly stronger and more organized then the west Roman Empire and would eventually be the cause of the Byzantine Empire conquering the Roman Empire.
“But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay.” (Gibbon)The Roman Empire collapsed itself. It was surprising that it lasted as long as it did. The military seized the freedom of the republic. Also, the legions in the army challenged the higher class which caused the Emperors to become corrupt. After the emperors where corrupt what good would come for the empire? It was all about the Emperor.
Rome started off as a strong powerful empire. But through many errors in ways and some bad judgment decisions by the Emperors the Empire did fall. The empire splitting in two really started the whole fall of Rome. But, the whole set up of the empire makes it surprising that it ever lasted how long it did. The Roman Empire was once a great civilization but then came crashing down.



Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Fall of the Roman Empire: Rough

The Roman Empire started as a great civilization. Julius Caesar set the city up to prosper.  Also, other emperors expanded and made the Empire into the large power of its age. The problem began when the Nation split into two, the east and the west.  The Empire of Rome started off as a great power and then fell and was changed into a completely different civilization. However, in some ways the Roman Empire was formed into something different.
“As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear, without surprise or scandal, that the introduction, or at least the abuse, of Christianity had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.” (Gibbon) The Empire split due to religion. Instead of being in camps worshiping the emperor, people where in synods worshiping their gods. This caused the emperors to get annoyed and Tyranny began. While religion played a large role in the fall of the Roman Empire, it still also lessened the violence. Due to Constantine’s conversion to Christianity, the conquerors of the Roman Empire where mollified.  
“The decay of Rome has been frequently ascribed to the translation of the seat of empire; but this history has already shown that the powers of government were divided rather than removed.”(Gibbon) Rome was not really one empire. It was more so two smaller empires put together, the east and west. The Byzantine Empire, the east, was ruled by one emperor. However, the West side was ruled by a series of emperors.  This set up made the Byzantine Empire slightly stronger and more organized then the west Roman Empire and would eventually be the cause of the Byzantine Empire conquering the Roman Empire.
“But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay.” (Gibbon)The Roman Empire collapsed itself. It was surprising that it lasted as long as it did. The military seized the freedom of the republic. Also, the legions in the army challenged the higher class which caused the Emperors to become corrupt. After the emperors where corrupt what good would come for the empire? It was all about the Emperor.
Rome started off as a strong powerful empire. But through many errors in ways and some bad judgment decisions by the Emperors the Empire did fall. The empire splitting in two really started the whole fall of Rome. But, the whole set up of the empire makes it surprising that it ever lasted how long it did. The Roman Empire was once a great civilization but then came crashing down.



Friday, April 8, 2011

Stoicism Final draft

Stoicism is a philosophy of life. In Stoicism people control their emotions and stop their feelings so they can stay focused. If someone falls in battle Stoics must stay focused so they don’t face the same fate. Emotions are distractions and in Stoicism those distractions are eliminated. Stoicism is a belief that when faced with hardships emotions are controlled and are restrained from taking over; events surrounding Seneca's death are perfect illustrations of Stoicism in action. But, Seneca did show some signs of weakness in his Stoicism and at times wasn't a very good model.
 “At the same time he called them back from their tears to manly resolution, now with friendly talk, and now with the sterner language of rebuke. "Where," he asked again and again, "are your maxims of philosophy, or the preparation of so many years' study against evils to come?” (Tacitus) This quote basically says don’t feel sad for Seneca because our philosophy tells us they don’t need to get emotional about evils. Seneca is trying to make his friends realize that even though he will pass they need to stay focused and concentrate on the future not to weep over the past. Seneca is setting the example of Stoicism into his friends.
 "He had no reason," he said, for "preferring the interest of any private citizen to his own safety, and he had no natural aptitude for flattery. No one knew this better than Nero, who had oftener experienced Seneca's free spokenness than his servility." When the tribune reported this answer in the presence of Poppaea and Tigellinus, the emperor's most confidential advisers in his moments of rage, he asked whether Seneca was meditating suicide.(tacitus)” Seneca is speaking his mind. He has no feelings towards the men sent after him he just spoke to them his mind. He didn’t believe what Nero was doing so he spoke out against it like he did many times before. Stoics are not afraid of consequences they have no emotion. Seneca is the ideal example of this.
“Seneca, quite unmoved, asked for tablets on which to inscribe his will” (Tacitus) This quote shows real life proof of Stoicism. Seneca was told he was to be put to death but didn’t show emotion or feeling from this at all. Seneca was unmoved the quote says Seneca is going to die and is more focused on writing his will then begging to live. He blocks out emotion and feeling and is able to stay focused.           

Stoicism isn’t just an attitude; Stoicism is a way of life. This change in stoic’s attitudes makes their lives completely different. Seneca used this as a way to keep his mind focused. Seneca did not show emotion throughout his entire execution. He showed no sign of weakness and gave the “bad guys” no satisfaction that he would break to their accusations.  Stoicism is summed by saying no emotion no feeling through any circumstances; Seneca is the perfect and ideal model of Stoicism.



Thursday, April 7, 2011

Peer critique


News Flash: Starting tomorrow, April 7th, we will stop doing dailies. Instead, we will be concentrating on the weekly essays. This week's rough draft we are finishing in class. From then on, every Wednesday you will have a rough draft due for Peer review (you'll receive participation credit: P/F for having the draft ready). On your rough draft, please underline the thesis statement and in a different color prove it is an opinion by writing the opposite side; underline one quote properly cited with in-text citations for each body paragraph; make bold your four-sentence analysis of each quote; analysis should explain how the quote serves to support your thesis. After peer review, a final draft will be due on Fri by Midnight.

Eleven-Point Critique (for peer reviews and grading of final drafts)

1. 5 paragraphs -- 5 to 7 sentences per paragraph.

2 Clear, coherent thesis statement expressing an opinion to be argued in the paper.

3. One quote or piece of sourcable evidence properly cited in APA format per body paragraph / proper in-text citation format

(author, date). APA format bibliography at end of paper. Use top-notch sources (BBC, Met Museum, Nat Geo, Internet History

Sourcebook, school-library based databases, etc.)

4. Four sentences per body paragraph analysis. This is your own analysis demonstrating how the evidence supports your thesis.

5. Solid conclusion demonstrating the validity of the argument.

6. Emphasis: Put strongest evidence in the fourth paragraph.

7. No 1st or 2nd person personal pronouns (I, we, us, me, my, myself, you, etc.)

8. Academic Tone: No slang, no contractions, make it coherent and readable.

9. Avoid generalizations -- give specific information; I'm not looking for you to write an "encyclopedia" article. I'm looking for

your ability to construct an academic argument.

10. Avoid unnecessary information: "more" quotes doesn't mean a "better" paper.

11. Original and honest writing voice and a creative and remarkable take on the subject.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Stoicism

Stoicism is a philosophy of life. In Stoicism people control their emotions and stop their feelings so they can stay focused. If someone falls in battle Stoics must stay focused so they don’t face the same fate. Emotions are distractions and in Stoicism those distractions are eliminated. Stoicism is a belief that when faced with hardships emotions are controlled and are restrained from taking over; events surrounding Seneca's death are perfect illustrations of Stoicism in action. But, Seneca did show some signs of weakness in his Stoicism and at times wasn't a very good model. 

“Seneca, quite unmoved, asked for tablets on which to inscribe his will” (Tacitus) This quote shows real life proof of Stoicism. Seneca was told he was to be put to death but didn’t show emotion or feeling from this at all. Seneca was unmoved the quote says Seneca is going to die and is more focused on writing his will then begging to live. He blocks out emotion and feeling and is able to stay focused.           
 “At the same time he called them back from their tears to manly resolution, now with friendly talk, and now with the sterner language of rebuke. "Where," he asked again and again, "are your maxims of philosophy, or the preparation of so many years' study against evils to come?” (Tacitus) This quote basically says don’t feel sad for Seneca because our philosophy tells us they don’t need to get emotional about evils. Seneca is trying to make his friends realize that even though he will pass they need to stay focused and concentrate on the future not to weep over the past. Seneca is setting the example of Stoicism into his friends.
 "He had no reason," he said, for "preferring the interest of any private citizen to his own safety, and he had no natural aptitude for flattery. No one knew this better than Nero, who had oftener experienced Seneca's free spokenness than his servility." When the tribune reported this answer in the presence of Poppaea and Tigellinus, the emperor's most confidential advisers in his moments of rage, he asked whether Seneca was meditating suicide.(tacitus)” Seneca is speaking his mind. He has no feelings towards the men sent after him he just spoke to them his mind. He didn’t believe what Nero was doing so he spoke out against it like he did many times before. Stoics are not afraid of consequences they have no emotion. Seneca is the ideal example of this.
Stoicism isn’t just an attitude. Stoicism is a way of life. This change in their attitudes makes their lives completely different. Stoicism is summed up by saying no emotion no feeling through any circumstances; Seneca is the perfect and ideal model of Stoicism.



Tuesday, April 5, 2011

daily 2 week 9

From Mr. Wojo i learned the importance advances

From Mrs. Gavorik i learned the art of learning

From Mrs. Brenda i learned the art of patience

From Mrs. Healy i learned the enjoyment and fun in learning

From Mrs. Zurkowski i learned the importance of time management.

Monday, April 4, 2011

daily 1 week 9

"are your maxims of philosophy, or the preparation of so many years' study against evils to come? Who knew not Nero's cruelty? After a mother's and a brother's murder, nothing remains but to add the destruction of a guardian and a tutor."
"I have shown you ways of smoothing life; you prefer the glory of dying. I will not grudge you such a noble example. Let the fortitude of so courageous an end be alike in both of us, but let there be more in your decease to win fame."
From Apollonius I learned freedom of will and undeviating steadiness of purpose; and to look to nothing else, not even for a moment, except to reason; and to be always the same, in sharp pains, on the occasion of the loss of a child, and in long illness; and to see clearly in a living example that the same man can be both most resolute and yielding, and not peevish in giving his instruction;
Alexander the grammarian, to refrain from fault-finding, and not in a reproachful way to chide those who uttered any barbarous or solecistic or strange-sounding expression;
From Maximus I learned self-government, and not to be led aside by anything;